Skip to content

Pipelines — purpose, evidence and remaining work ​

Verification status — 6 October 2026

The pipeline audit is still open. The August inventory below records what an earlier inspection reported; its “built” labels do not establish that the complete research journey works. The program audit separates current findings, remaining coverage and proposed repairs. No repair or automation activation is approved by this page.

A pipeline is an automated path that gets something into the library and keeps it current. These pages cover content collection, brand onboarding, campaign recognition and ongoing monitoring, together with their routing and prompts.

Earlier implementation inventory — 17 August 2026 ​

The earlier inspection described one pipeline as fully built, two as partly built, and one as fragments. It described routing as built with a dormant part. These were implementation observations, not completed product acceptance. The diagram and tables below retain that inspection’s scope and date.

The August map ​

Have versus need — August snapshot ​

PipelineWhere it stands
The content pipelineBuilt. Fifteen stages, verified against the code stage by stage
Brand onboardingPartly built — more than expected. Entity enrichment works; a five-stage brand-guidelines pipeline exists and has run for twelve brands. Missing: a products-and-features harvest, and the "onboard this brand" routing step
The campaign pipelineFragments. A synthesis script exists but only runs by hand; the evidence machinery has run a handful of times across two campaigns; nothing detects a campaign on its own
Continuous monitoringPartly built. Newsroom ingestion works; a re-scan scheduler exists but ships switched off. Missing: the daily recognition pass and any real alerting
Routing & promptsBuilt, with a dormant half. Sixteen live routes pick a prompt by source; the smarter semantic layer exists but is switched off; prompts are hand-written today, and the ruled future is prompts generated from the registry

What each pipeline reads and writes (the tie to the data model) ​

The earlier inspection reported these reads and writes on 17 August 2026:

PipelineWrites toWatched through
The content pipelinethe piece's own fields + its classification linksthe execution log — every model call with its stage and cost
Brand onboardingthe entity's facts · the brand-guideline sectionsthe same execution log
The campaign pipelinecampaigns · membership links · the two evidence surfacesthe intelligence run tables
Continuous monitoringobservations · risk signals · relationship eventsthe collection-run log; the alerts surface is built but empty
All of themnothing runs on a schedule unless the single master switch is on — and it is off; every run so far was started by handone flag, one query

How to read the pipeline pages ​

Each page introduces its purpose, labels its historical inventory and links to later evidence. Approved requirements remain distinct from implementation observations. Follow the program audit for verified findings and remaining coverage. A missing capability is work to plan; it does not invalidate the approved model.

The BrandTrackers domain model. Source: git markdown, drift-checked against the live DB.