Do these five words earn a place on your list?

You approved your words one at a time in August, and infographic was not among them. The library has been writing it anyway. 62 pieces carry that one word today.

So I looked at the pieces. One is a chart out of a research post: four line graphs: lifetime-in-tournament across opponent population sizes. It reads like a figure in a paper. Most are not like that. 47 of the 62 came from the LinkedIn ad library, which is the public archive of ads a company has run. There, each one is the picture inside an ad.

Some of those ad pictures hold charts too. One set is titled ChatGPT usage and adoption patterns at work. That is exactly the difficulty: the word would have to cover both a figure in a paper and a designed slide inside an ad.

That gap is the decision. If the word stays, it has to mean both, and a word that means two things is hard to browse by. If the word goes, each piece is looked at again and comes back as one of the words you did approve, most often Key Visual.

One more fact. Every one of these pieces already says whether it is a picture or a video. The word infographic is not what tells you that. It only claims what kind of picture, and on the ad pieces that claim is doing no work.

Nothing else about these pieces changes. The brand named on them, the campaign they belong to and the kinds of work noted on them all stay as they are. On the research chart that work is data visualization; on the ad it is graphic design. Nothing else leans on this word.

Nothing moves today. Either answer runs later, with the rest of the re-labelling.

25 pieces carry this word. The first picture above is OpenAI going behind the scenes with shy kids, the studio that merged Sora footage with live action for their short film. 16 of the 25 are on YouTube, so this is not one feed's habit.

Brands keep making these on purpose. 21 of the 25 say behind the scenes, behind the design or bloopers in their own title, and Nike alone has a long Behind the Design series.

The only real question is whether this is a kind of piece or a way of shooting one. A behind-the-scenes cut of a campaign film is, arguably, still that campaign film.

If it stays a kind, these 25 pieces keep their word and it joins one of your groups. If it becomes a way of shooting, the word comes off each piece and the piece goes back to being the film it documents. The footage, the brand and the picture do not change either way, and nothing moves today.

14 pieces carry this word and they are the real thing. One is the GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-5.1 Thinking System Card Addendum. 13 of the 14 come from the company's own release pages, and 1 from a separate safety site.

Until you named a Documentation & Technical group there was nowhere for a document like this to sit. That is why the word got invented. That group now holds white paper, specification, release notes and their neighbours.

So the question is narrow. Does that group take one more word, or is a system card a white paper with a different cover?

As a word of its own, the 14 pieces keep it and your technical group gains an entry. Folded into white paper, the word goes and these pieces are found under that instead. The document, its brand and its link stay exactly as they are, and nothing moves today.

9 pieces carry this word. 6 are Nike Playlist episodes, like Chipping with Golfer Lucy Li. 7 of the 9 are on YouTube and the other 2 run as paid ads.

Kind or look is a genuine coin flip here, and with this few pieces you can decide it on taste.

You said in March that it is easy to check whether something was correctly classified as a vlog. That is the strongest argument for keeping it, and it is yours rather than mine: a word you can check by eye earns its place even on a small number of pieces. I still lean the other way, because these are all episodes of a brand series, and that is the word I would look for.

Kept, the word stays on 9 pieces. Dropped, each one is looked at again and comes back as the series episode or brand film it is. The video, the athlete in it and the channel it ran on are untouched, and nothing moves today.

5 pieces carry this word. 4 are DevDay photographs from one studio's portfolio: the venue atrium with its ASCII flower mural, the keynote hall, the bracket wayfinding sculptures and the inflatable frog mascot.

The one that is left is a Codex ad, Take everyday work from idea to finished output with Codex, which the library read as an event photograph.

Your Events & Experiential group already holds Event Film, Keynote and the booth or installation piece. So the pick is whether photography joins them, or whether these are key visuals that happen to have been shot at an event.

As a word of its own, event photo joins your events group and the 5 pieces keep it. Dropped, the photographs become key visuals shot at an event. Either way the stray ad is looked at again and comes back as an ad, because it was never an event photo.

The photographs, the studio credit and the links to where they were published are untouched, and nothing moves today.